Cock and balls; nuts drop - the result

Hello, hello.

So two days ago, fish in a stroke of brilliance suggested this idea to me. If you have no idea why the title of this post concerns cocks and balls and nuts, I suggest you go read the challenge first.

I decided that, further to fish's challenges, I had to have other rules to make it proper.

My interpretation of the mandate is thus: the objective is to maintain the title as it stands, while points are for creativity in interpreting the meaning of the title.

Condition 1. There will be no naming of entities to convenience the title. That basically means I won't name someone Cock or Balls or something like that. I mean, if your teacher asks you to use a word, say 'smelly', in a sentence, you don't go 'I looked up the word 'smelly' in the dictionary', do you? In other words, this would be a cop-out and basically can be used with any word, not just cock or balls etc. So, cock has to mean cock, balls have to mean balls, and so on.

Condition 2. There will be no punctuation or tenses to convenience the title. I didn't check with fish on this one, but I did play around with the idea of playing 'and' as a London pronunciation of 'hand', but I felt that would be too weak. Similarly nothing like 'nuts dropped' etc.

Condition 3. The title, namely 'cock and balls; nuts drop' would have to make sense as a sentence. This being clearly almost fricking impossible seeing that the sentence doesn't make any sense as it is.

Having said that, I present my response to fish's challenge. Leave a comment, and let me know what you think! Does my response adequately address fish's challenge?

MY RESPONSE - The Scavenger newsletter, click to read.

Ok enough of this subject for a while, people are beginning to think this is a pornographic site. Not good.

[UPDATE] I am AWARD WINNING! Check the left side of the blog to see my award.

[UPDATE] Medley of thoughts

Obviously simply drawing the first thing that pops to mind would be simple. But it wouldn't be a good piece; it is borderline infringing Condition 1. In other words, drawing the following is not kosher.

EXAMPLE OF A LAME ENTRY - I know this looks more like a dildo and dogshit, but this was done in like 2 minutes la.

One idea very nearly made it. In this scenario, I pictured a small English town which was tired of its church ringing everyday, which was very loud and not very melodious. I didn't work out the intermediate details in the end, but it basically ends in a scene where escapees from a mental asylum chicken-nap a rooster and climb to the top of the church tower. They then hurl the ill-fated chicken into the bells and the poor bird is squashed and finally muffles the ringing. After that, they slip and fall down the tower. I was then going to work in a typo-error explanation into the newspaper headlines next day which originally intended to read 'Cock end bells; nuts drop', but ended up something else due to either a missing 'e' key, or a software bug replacing all 'e's with 'a's. Delicious idea. I'm not sure which is the better idea, this one or the final one, but I thought the final one 'packaged' better into a single newspaper article with illustrations, whereas this idea would have trouble.